| How would you like to see an AI SDK marketed/evolve/controlled? |
| |
The Microsoft Approach: Tightly controlled by one company, with periodic updates. (14) |
4% |
 |
| |
The OpenGL Approach: A standards body controls the SDK per se, but anybody can license it and submit suggestions for new features. (59) |
15% |
 |
| |
The Linux/Open Source Approach: Completely free and non-commercial, totally open-source, maintained by AI developers across the industry and academia. (220) |
57% |
 |
| |
The Free Market Approach: Multiple competing SDKs from different companies covering the spectrum of features and price. (48) |
12% |
 |
| |
I don't care, so long as it's a good SDK. (48) |
12% |
 |
Total Votes: 389
|